I make no money from the ads (pop-ups) you see in the post and are owned by
YUKU, and all profits from the ads go entirely to YUKU.
Daily Average Viewers: 120,000
Viewers Since 3/02: 122,173,101
The RANT ranked 326 in the world.
For all your
Steven R. Blyer Attorney at Law Real Estate Law and General Litigation
Lake Success, NY 11042.
516 354 5666
(*inquire about Thee Rant member rate discount)
Animal Rescue & Adoption Center
Wounded Warrior Project
Please help the Wounded warriors
who gave up so much to keep this country free.
Need extra Cash?
Catering to active and retired cops.
Zoom Wireless (verizon) Specializing
in PD & FD discounts. (631)242-9020
The Computer Pitstop. Repairs, Anti-Virus, updating and more... (631)884-0703
Search this Topic:
Charges officially dropped 20 years later July 22, 2008 www.martytankleff.org
By John Springer, Court TV, July 20, 2004
PORT JEFFERSON, NY - Compelling new evidence uncovered in an old case could one day free a Long Island man convicted in 1990 of the brutal murders of his adoptive parents, court papers filed Thursday say.
Lawyers and a private investigator for 32-year-old Martin Tankleff claim that a career burglar with a guilty conscience told them in August that he served as the getaway driver for what he thought was a run-of-the-mill house burglary in this affluent community on the North Shore of Long Island on Sept. 7, 1988.
The defense says the inmate's claim that his two accomplices emerged from the burglary with blood on their clothes corroborates another witness's statement, provided to the prosecution and defense as long ago as 1991, that one of the men bragged about the murders.
The Suffolk County district attorney's office has promised to investigate the new evidence, which could be the last great hope for longtime supporters, including siblings of victims Seymour Tankleff and Arlene Tankleff.
Martin Tankleff, who had just turned 17 when his parents were killed, has exhausted most of his appeals and has served just more than one-fourth of a sentence of 50 years to life in an upstate prison.
The night before the attacks, the Tankleffs' million-dollar home overlooking Long Island Sound was abuzz with chatter from the "After Dinner Club," the regular Tuesday night poker game that featured $2,000 pots.
The venue for the game rotated among the homes of the regular players, including the mayor of Belle Terre and the village's chief constable, retired insurance executive Seymour Tankleff.
Jerry Steuerman, the "Bagel King of Long Island," was a business associate of the murdered Seymour Tankleff.
The game broke at about 3 a.m. and Seymour Tankleff, as was his habit, remained in his study doing paperwork after the last of his guests left. On that occasion, the last guest was Jerry Steuerman, the self-styled "Bagel King of Long Island" and a business associate of Tankleff who owed him $500,000.
A few hours later, Martin Tankleff called 911 to report that he had awoken to find his father in his study bleeding from a severe neck wound. When police and paramedics arrived, they learned that Arlene Tankleff was dead in her bedroom at the opposite end of the expansive ranch-style home.
Both victims were bludgeoned and had their throats slashed. Arlene Tankleff was nearly decapitated.
Martin Tankleff immediately pointed the finger at Jerry Steuerman. Detectives testified during a 13-week trial two years later that they had noted Martin's suspicions but were curious to find out why someone would attack both of his parents but leave Martin, as he claimed, sleeping in the bedroom next to his mother's.
A few hours later, Seymour Tankleff lay hospitalized in a coma and Martin Tankleff was seated alone in an interrogation room at the Suffolk police homicide bureau.
Homicide Det. K. James McCready told the teenager that his father had come out of his coma and fingered Martin in the attack. In fact, Seymour Tankleff never came out of his coma and died a few weeks later before he could tell police anything.
The detective's lie got Martin to break down and give a confession. He told police with very little prodding that his parents were smothering him, that he had a fight with his mother about not setting up the table for the card game, and that he didn't want to drive "the crummy old Lincoln" to school.
Noting that his father never lied to him, Martin told McCready and partner Norman Rein that he must have "blacked out" and attacked his parents.
About a week after the attacks, police found Jerry Steuerman's Lincoln Towne Car unoccupied but running with the doors open near Long Island's MacArthur Airport. Police, who learned that Steuerman had tapped a joint account he held with Seymour Tankleff after the killings, began a missing person's investigation. When police found Steuerman in a spa in California, he told detectives he was laying low and traveling under an alias because of the stress of the police investigation and Martin's accusations.
Police believed that Steuerman was merely an available scapegoat for Martin Tankleff, who had already confessed to the crime. Steuerman testified for the prosecution at Tankleff's trial that he had returned home after the card game and gone to bed. His wife corroborated his account.
According to a motion for a new trial filed Thursday, private investigator Jay Salpeter uncovered the new evidence by following an old trail. A Long Island woman told the defense in 1991 that an acquaintance, Joseph Creedon, had bragged that he was involved in the Tankleff murders.
Salpeter looked up police reports of Creedon's prior arrests and learned that he had once been arrested for a burglary along with Glenn Harris. Salpeter visited Harris in an upstate prison earlier this year.
"This has bothered me for a long time and when [Salpeter] contacted me it gave me the opportunity to tell the truth," Harris said in an affidavit attached to the motion.
Assistant District Attorney John Collins, who prosecuted Tankleff during a televised 13-week trial in 1990, told Courttv.com that he had not received the court documents and therefore could not comment.
Collins is now in charge of District Attorney Thomas Spota's homicide bureau. A spokesperson for Spota did not return calls. The whereabouts of Creedon and the other man named by Harris, Peter Kent, is not known.
[Related: Tankleff kin seek Spota removal]
Salpeter said he just wants prosecutors to do the investigation they should have done when they first heard about the allegation against Creedon in 1991.
"All I ask is that the district attorney give our investigation and Marty a fair shot," he said. "I can't ask for anything more. If they thoroughly investigate, I can't see us losing here and I think Marty Tankleff will be a free man finally."
At a press conference Thursday afternoon, relatives of Tankleff, who never wavered in their belief that he did not commit the crimes, expressed hope that the new evidence will free him.
"We never lost faith. We always thought we would get a positive conclusion, sometime," said Ron Falbee, Tankleff's cousin. "It was a real injustice."
Seymour Tankleff's brother, Norman Tankleff, and Arlene Tankleff's sister, Marcella Falbee, also support their adoptive grandson's bid for freedom.
"Outside of being a little spoiled, he was a loving member of the family," Norman Tankleff said. "We always believed in Marty's innocence."
Tankleff's older half-sister, Shari, did not attend the press conference. She said after the trial that she came to the conclusion over time that Martin Tankleff was the killer.
After Tankleff's trial, jurors told reporters they did not believe the defendant's testimony that police coerced a false confession from him. Prosecutors also made much of the fact that despite Tankleff's insistence that he never entered his mother's bedroom, her blood was found on a tissue in his pocket and smeared on a light switch in his bedroom.
By John Springer, Court TV, Feb. 4, 2002
Retired New York insurance broker Seymour Tankleff bid goodnight to members of his weekly high-stakes poker game and settled down to paperwork in the study of his expansive home overlooking the Long Island Sound.
It was 3 a.m. on Sept. 7, 1988, when the last of the "After Dinner Club" players departed the 5,000-square-foot ranch-style home Tankleff shared with his wife and 17-year-old son, Marty, in the exclusive North Shore enclave of Belle Terre, N.Y.
Tankleff, 62, was commissioner of constables for the incorporated village but had few official duties. Belle Terre, which means "beautiful land" in Latin, was known not for crime but rather for its million-dollar homes located at the end of long, winding driveways leading into the woods.
Belle Terre proved not to be a safe place to live, however - at least not for Tankleff and his 53-year-old wife, Arlene. Sometime between 3 a.m. and 6 a.m., someone savagely bludgeoned Seymour and Arlene Tankleff and then slit their throats.
Marty Tankleff, who was to supposed to begin his senior year of high school that Tuesday morning 13 years ago, whimpered "someone murdered my parents" when the first police officers arrived in response to his 911 call at 6:10 a.m. Marty told the operator that he awoke to find his father alive but "gushing blood" from a neck wound. Arlene Tankleff, who was nearly decapitated, was already dead when she was found in the master bedroom on the opposite end of the house.
Within minutes of the arrival of investigators, Marty told police that he knew who most likely was behind the killings: Jerry Steuerman, his father's business partner in a chain of bagel stores and the last person to leave following the poker game. Steuerman and Seymour Tankleff had been having a dispute about the bagel stores for about 10 weeks. Arlene Tankleff had expressed fears two weeks earlier that Steuerman was capable of violence, Marty told two homicide detectives.
Veteran homicide Det. K. James McCready, one of a long line of McCreadys to become Suffolk County cops, was interested in what Marty was telling him about Steuerman but was more interested in hearing Marty's story. The youth voluntarily accompanied detectives to police headquarters for an interview.
According to a 14-page police report, Marty told McCready and partner Norman Rein that he showered and kissed his mother goodnight about 11:15 p.m. the night before the killings. Marty awoke about 5:35 a.m. but lay in bed until 6:10 a.m., when he got up, turned on the bedroom light from the wall switch and prepared for his first day at Earl L. Vandermuelen High School in nearby Port Jefferson.
Marty told McCready and Rein that he then he noticed that the lights were still on in the house and he went to investigate. The master bedroom was dark and there was no sign of anyone there, so Marty went to his father's office and discovered Seymour Tankleff severely injured.
Using a phone in the office, Marty placed the 911 call, according to the police account of the interview. Marty then followed the operator's instructions, grabbing a clean towel and placing it over the wound. Marty told McCready that his hands were covered with blood when he opened a door to the garage to see if his mother's car was there - it was - and when he used a kitchen phone to call his step-sister and a friend from school who was expecting a ride.
Having already walked through the Tankleff home, McCready was suspicious. Why, he wanted to know, was there no blood on the doorknob to the garage nor the phone in the kitchen? And why was there blood on the light switch in his room if he had turned it on when he first awoke?
Marty did not have any answers that satisfied McCready, so he tried something controversial but that already had the stamp of approval from the U.S. Supreme Court. McCready tricked Marty.
"I stepped out of the room for a moment and caused one of the other extensions in the office to ring. I then answered the telephone in a loud clear voice," McCready wrote in his report. "I then re-entered the [interview] room and told Marty that his father had come out of his comatose state due to the fact that he was given adrenaline ... and said he, Marty, had beaten and stabbed him."
Seymour Tankleff, in fact, still lay hospitalized in a coma at that point. He died 29 days later, never regaining consciousness or identifying his attacker. McCready's deceit, however, had the desired effect. Marty began to wonder aloud whether he could have attacked his parents and not remembered.
"He said whoever did this needs psychiatric help. We then asked him if he thought he needed psychiatric help," the report continued. "He then asked if he could have blacked out and done it ... He said that maybe it wasn't him, but another Marty Tankleff that killed them ... He said he could have been possessed ... He said it was starting to come to him."
[Related: Consequences of False Confessions | Expert on false confessions]
McCready stopped the interview at that point and advised Marty Tankleff of his right to remain silent. Marty, however, was still willing to talk.
He went on to tell the detectives a chilling story of how his displeasure with his parent's constant fighting and his sense of being under his mother's "thumb" became too much for him. Among his complaints were that he was not permitted to play contact sports, he lost his boating privileges and that he was being forced to drive "the crummy old Lincoln" rather than a sportier car. His parents were upset that he did not complete a list of chores.
Most of all, Marty feared what would become of him if his parents, who adopted him at birth, divorced. He acknowledged that if both his parents were dead, he stood to inherit a large amount of money.
Then came the confession. According to McCready, Marty described waking up about 5:35 a.m. attacking his mother first with the bar of a dumbbell from his bedroom. Naked to avoid getting any blood on his clothes, Marty claimed he struck his mother four or five times but she fought back, yelling, "Why?" and "Please help!" Arlene Tankleff fell off the bed and Marty ran to the kitchen and grabbed a knife next to a watermelon, which was then used to cut her throat, according to McCready's account of the confession.
Still naked, Marty hid the bar and knife behind his back as he confronted his father, who was still seated behind the desk in the study where the card game was held.
"What are you doing?" Seymour Tankleff asked Marty, according to the police account of the confession. Marty went on to describe knocking "him silly" with the barbell before cutting his throat.
McCready's report winds down with Marty Tankleff describing how he then washed off blood from himself and the weapons in the shower, and putting the weapons back before getting back into bed. Marty agreed to give a written and videotaped confession but police never got that far.
A phone call from a lawyer ended the interview abruptly and police got all they were going to get from Martin Tankleff, who was booked on two counts of murder.
Marty Tankleff confessed to killing his parents within hours of the gruesome murders of his adoptive parents, but the case was far from closed. Marty's extended family quickly hired prominent defense lawyer Robert Gottlieb to represent the 17-year-old and Gottlieb moved quickly to get his client freed on $1 million bail.
The confession, the defense contended, was the product of coercion by police detectives anxious to make an arrest and the real killer or killers were on the loose.
Then Jerry Steuerman disappeared mysteriously, after clearing out a joint account he and Seymour Tankleff controlled. Steuerman's 1987 Lincoln Towne Car was discovered near Islip-McArthur Airport about a week after the killings with the keys in the ignition, the engine running and both the driver and passenger doors ajar.
Police said they did not consider Steuerman a suspect but were obliged to look for him. They put a trap on his girlfriend's phone and it paid off 29 days later. Steuerman called his girlfriend from California and mouthed one word: "pistachio." It was their pre-arranged signal to indicate that he was alive and well. Steuerman explained to police that he staged his disappearance and made up stories about receiving death threats because the killings frightened him and he was tired of people looking at him accusingly.
The Tankleff case was getting more bizarre with each passing day. Long Island and New York City newspaper were competing fiercely to break developments and testimony about Marty Tankleff's purported confession as a slew of pre-trial hearings brought more and more attention to the case.
Revelations surfaced about different characters in the case that further twisted the story. Steuerman, the self-style "Bagel King of Long Island," was repaying Seymour Tankleff $2,500 a week toward more than $350,000 Steuerman had borrowed from his partner. Reports surfaced that McCready, who had the reputation of being an effective detective but a bit of a cowboy, had been accused of lying about a suspect's identification in an unrelated murder case in 1985. He claimed it was a mistake - not perjury.
It was against that backdrop that Marty Tankleff went on trial in April 1990. The proceedings in Suffolk County Court in Riverhead were televised almost gavel to gavel by a Long Island cable news station - a full year before Court TV first went on the air.
A jury of seven men and five women listened to evidence in the Tankleff case for more than 10 weeks. They heard the 911 operator, neighbors, the poker players - including the mayor of Belle Terre - paramedics and friends of Marty who said he had recently mentioned that he could have any car he wanted if his parents were dead.
The jury also heard numerous forensic witnesses, including police criminologists and hair experts. A blood expert testified that the watermelon knife tested negative for blood and could not be tested for fingerprints. Another witness testified that tissues in Marty's sweatshirt pocket had blood from his mother, although he told police he never approached her body.
There was also testimony that the blood from a print found on the light switch in Marty's bedroom, which had a pattern on it indicative that a glove was worn, came either from Marty or his mother.
The prosecution was more or less forced to call Jerry Steuerman, the business partner, to establish that he was at his daughter's home within 19 minutes of the end of the card game. For three days, Steuerman answered questions about his business dealings, money he owed his partner and his staged disappearance to California.
The defense was trying to establish that Steuerman had more motive than Marty and that the police did next to nothing to investigate the possibility that Steuerman could have been involved. Steuerman had had enough by his third day on the stand.
"I staged the [disappearance] scenario because I did not want to be going through what I have been going through here," Steuerman testified on cross-examination by Gottlieb.
"Three days on the witness stand and I didn't do anything. It is not fair," he said, raising his voice. "It's not fair that I am being put through this and Marty Tankleff, who is accusing me, is not. I am sitting here for three days baring my soul to the world and it is not fair."
Gottlieb tried several times to interrupt but was unsuccessful. Steuerman had a lot to get off his chest and did 13 days into the trial.
"The only mistake I made in my life ... The only mistake is I lived lavishly. I was a poor man living like a millionaire," Steuerman said. "I did a foolish thing [by leaving]. ... but I am no murderer and I should not be here."
Before the trial, McCready publicly talked about his dislike for Gottlieb and promised that there would be some heated exchanges. He was right.
Prosecutor John Collins led McCready through his early suspicion about Marty and his account of the confession.
"The demeanor of the defendant at the time I spoke to him, from the time I first spoke to him, was totally, totally inappropriate," said McCready, who was by then retired. "His emotional response to what was going on in that house - about what had happened to his father his mother - was totally, totally inappropriate."
Gottlieb made much of the fact that Marty was separated from his family and wore no shoes and only a sweatshirt and shorts during what he called his "interrogation" by McCready. He asked the retired detective about his 1985 testimony in the unrelated case that was called into question, all in an effort to show the jury that McCready rushed to judgment about Marty and got a traumatized teen to implicate himself.
"Can you agree that different people react differently to stress?" Gottlieb asked. "As a matter of fact, some people under stress became very calm in dealing with stress. Would you agree that it would be a very stressful situation to find one's father brutally stabbed, detective?"
McCready's answer silenced Gottlieb and the packed courtroom for a full 10 seconds.
"Oh, God I would never want to find my mother and father the way he found his," McCready said. "I think anybody in this room, other than the defendant, would probably be a box of rocks if they found their parents like that."
The defense challenged every forensic witness for the prosecution almost point for point, hair by hair. Comparing the confession to crime scene evidence, Gottlieb was attempting to raise reasonable doubt by noting that the police account of Marty's statement did not jibe with the hair and blood evidence.
Gottlieb challenged the police investigation as a sloppy and inept, and accused detectives of rushing to judgment about Marty's involvement in the killings after minimal investigation.
Gottlieb also called a prominent Manhattan psychiatrist, Herbert Spiegel, to testify that Marty was a suggestible teen and was probably experiencing post-traumatic stress when he was being interviewed by police.
The jury was captivated, however, by the first defense witness. Reporters filed into the courtroom after word leaked out that Marty Tankleff would take the stand in his own defense. The move surprised many people. Putting the defendant on the stand is always risky, and one Tankleff juror had already been dismissed after commenting in a bar during the trial that perhaps police had the wrong guy.
"Marty, you have been charged with killing your mother and your father. Did you kill your mother? Gottlieb asked.
"Absolutely not," Marty replied.
"Marty, did you kill your father?" Gottlieb asked.
"Absolutely not," the defendant insisted.
Marty went onto to confirm that he made the incriminating statements attributed to him by McCready during testimony and in the police report. He said the statements, however, were intended to get police to leave him alone so that he could go see his father in the hospital.
McCready's phony telephone call and other things police were saying had Marty wondering if he could have done it, he testified. He said he was troubled by McCready's insistence that his hair was found clasped in his mother's hand and that his father awoke from his coma and implicated Marty.
"They had me believing that was the way it was. I was brought up to trust and believe in cops, and he was saying it as if it was fact," Marty said on the stand. "I felt this was all a nightmare and I would wake up and this would all be over."
At the end of testimony, the prosecutor, Collins, asked the jury to apply common sense during their deliberations.
Would someone who was innocent crumble and confess falsely so quickly? Why was Arlene Tankleff's blood on tissues in Marty's pocket if he didn't go near her body? Why wasn't there any blood on the doorknob to the garage and the phones if his hands were full of blood when he searched for his mother?
Finally, Collins asked jurors to ask themselves why Marty Tankleff was still alive and his parents were not.
"Your common sense will tell you that during the early morning hours of Sept. 7, 1988, someone did not just drop out of the sky and commit the savage attacks on Seymour and Arlene Tankleff and leave this defendant blissfully asleep in the room across the hall," Collins said.
Suffolk County Court Judge Alfred Tisch charged the jury and ordered the panel sequestered throughout their deliberations. The jury deliberated for eight days, at the time a record for a Suffolk County jury. Marty, who was still free on bail, paced the corridor outside the courtroom nervously, huddled always with cousins, aunts and uncles who stood by his side throughout the trial. Over a long weekend, he joined journalists watching the courtroom drama "Twelve Angry Men" on videotape.
On June 28, 1990, the jury finally agreed on a verdict. Marty Tankleff rose from his chair.
He winced when the jury found him guilty of the depraved indifference murder of his mother. He rested his head on the defense table after being convicted of intentional murder for the killing of his father.
McCready commented that it was first time he had seen Marty Tankleff cry. Several jurors said the defendant's lack of emotion during his testimony coupled with physical evidence led to their decision to convict, despite their lack of confidence in the police investigation and dislike of McCready and Steuerman.
One juror quickly reversed course, saying publicly that he was brow-beaten by another juror into voting guilty. The defense seized on several juror and prosecutorial misconduct charges but the convictions held up.
Marty Tankleff was sentenced to 50 years to life in prison and is serving his time at the Clinton Correctional Facility in Dannemora, N.Y. He will be 69 years old before he can even apply for parole.
Although he has exhausted every possible trial-related appeal to state and federal courts, Tankleff, now 30, has not given up and still maintains his innocence.
"I'm innocent. I am innocent," Tankleff insisted in an interview for a Court TV documentary on the case airing Feb. 6 at 10 p.m. "It wasn't me. I loved my parents. I would never hurt them."
Long Island private investigator Jay Salpeter, a retired New York City police detective, believes Tankleff and is investigating leads which he says the Suffolk County District Attorney's Office refused to investigate. He declined to disclose what those leads were but believes that, if proved, they could become form the basis for a new trial motion.
"This kid is innocent. Marty doesn't have a motive. The motive goes with Steuerman," Salpeter told Courttv.com. "Suffolk County police have a history of not being able to solve a murder case unless they have a confession or an eyewitness. We saw evidence of an intruder that they did not see."
Collins, the prosecutor, said he convicted the killer of Seymour and Arlene Tankleff and has seen no evidence to suggest otherwise.
"I have been involved in a number of cases over the years and some of them have continued to pursue all available remedies available to them under the state and federal law. I think money and the fact that there are some devoted family members still willing to pursue the cause makes this case somewhat different than the others," said Collins, now chief of the homicide bureau of the Suffolk County District Attorney's Office.
Gottlieb, a former Manhattan prosecutor who ran twice for Suffolk District Attorney and lost, said he is still troubled by the convictions and believes his client was not only innocent, but that the prosecution did not meet its burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
"I never understood the verdict. I never thought the verdict was supported by the evidence, which means if Marty didn't do it someone else did," Gottlieb said. "The task has always been to uncover who that other person or persons are ... Without never evidence, it is becoming more and more difficult to free Marty."
Tankleff's appeals lawyers fell one judge shy of winning a new trial when a federal court ruled 2 to 1 that the defendant was probably warned by detectives before he confessed. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal of that ruling two years ago, leaving pro bono appeals lawyer Steven Braga of Washington, D.C., with just two options.
Braga said he will make a motion this spring that Tankleff had "ineffective assistance of trial counsel." He could also request clemency from Gov. George Pataki on the grounds that Tankleff was wrongly convicted, which he acknowledges is a long shot.
Convicted of killing his wealthy parents after confessing 19 years ago, Martin Tankleff moved closer to freedom Friday when an appeals court said there's enough new evidence to convince a jury he's innocent.
A four-judge appellate panel unanimously overturned his conviction and said it's "probable" a second jury would acquit him because cops tricked him into confessing and his lawyers have uncovered new evidence.
"It appears the [Suffolk] County Court never considered the cumulative effect of the new evidence created a probability that had such evidence been received at the trial, the verdict would have been more favorable to [Tankleff]," the judges wrote.
Tankleff, 36, serving 50 years to life at Great Meadow prison in Comstock, was overjoyed.
"His first words were, 'Finally justice has started to tilt our way,'" lawyer Bruce Barket said. "I'm telling my secretary to get champagne. We're thrilled."
Tankleff, who was convicted in 1990, has been behind bars for more than 17 years for stabbing and bludgeoning his adopted parents, Arlene and Seymour, on Sept. 7, 1988.
Suffolk County detectives extracted a confession from Tankleff after tricking him into thinking his father had fingered him on his deathbed.
Tankleff, then 17, had been subjected to intensive questioning by Detective Kevin McCready, who committed perjury in another murder case.
"Could I have blacked out and done this? Could I be possessed?" Tankleff asked, according to court records.
"Marty, I think that's what happened to you," another detective responded.
Appellate Judges Reinaldo Rivera, Gabriel Krausman, Anita Florio and Mark Dillon wrote that the confession was clearly the linchpin of the prosecution's case.
They said the mountain of new evidence uncovered since the conviction warrants a new trial.
The new evidence includes information that Seymour Tankleff's partner in the bagel business, Jerald Steuerman, owed him hundreds of thousands of dollars and was playing cards with the victim on the night of the murders.
Steuerman, who could not be reached for comment, allegedly hired three goons to kill the Tankleffs. Anthony LaPinta, the lawyer for alleged hit man Joseph Creedon, said his client is an "innocent scapegoat."
A witness testified at a 2004 hearing that he was offered $25,000 from a partner in the bagel business to kill the other partner, but the lower court upheld the conviction.
The judges criticized the lower court for failing to properly evaluate the new evidence.
"It is abhorrent to our sense of justice and fair play to countenance the possibility that someone innocent of a crime may be incarcerated or otherwise punished for a crime which he or she did not commit," they wrote.
Barket said he will ask a judge to release Tankleff on bail next week. "We want justice and we want Marty exonerated," said Tankleff's cousin Ronald Falbee.
District Attorney Thomas Spota "respectfully disagreed" with the ruling but did not say if Tankleff would be retried.
"I would hope they would ... investigate the people who are really responsible," Barket said.
McCready, who later opened a bar with the husband of Tankleff's half sister Shari Rother, did not return calls.
dominop wrote:Hey Beachwear, was Jay Salpeter is the 103 or the 113, I seem to remember that name?
fatbobrob wrote:The discovery show was nothing new. I remember the 48Hrs special and the A&E show. If you can, view them and then read Salpeter's book'A criminal injustice '. Then decide for yourself.
© 2017 Yuku. All rights reserved.